sweaterkate:

i feel like there’s so many valid criticisms of ‘superwholock’ like the racism, misogyny, homophobia, etc. present in all those shows but 90% of the time i see it discussed on here it’s just used as an excuse to take a cheap shot at teenage girls for daring to enjoy something while being teenage girls

“Sherlock, Supernatural and Doctor Who are massively popular shows that teenage girls find appealing – maybe due to the portrayal of close male friendships that they can safely project their own desires onto (Sherlock, Supernatural), or the idea of a girl roughly their age working her way through a complex relationship with an attractive, powerful man (Doctor Who). Many of these young women in question have found geniune support systems both within the texts and within the fandom that surrounds them- fandom as a subculture has long provided an easy way for teenage girls to get the things they’re not getting, for good or for ill. For example, Sherlock and Supernatural’s queerbaiting male-male relationships provide a quick, easy gateway for a young girl -who might, of course, not be straight herself- into a ‘romance’ that she can relate to without ever having to ask the difficult questions. And of course, asking the difficult questions should be the job of the text, but they often fail in this regard – a problem made even more complicated and difficult by the fact that sometimes the people involved behind-the-scenes of popular shows, like many of their most defensive fans, are themselves members of marginalized groups. When critiquing problematic-but-popular TV shows, it’s important to remember just how much misogyny, homophobia etc is internalised, and also to bear in mind the problem of seeing any fandom as a homogeneous entity when any one will contain people of all genders, sexualities and backgrounds…

But unpicking all that is really haaaaard! So we reblogged a fourteen-year-old girl’s lovingly drawn Dean-Doctor-Sherlock fanart with the caption ‘ewww no this is gross’, instead.”