sexism

Geekdom is the only place where socially shunned males can be save and be themselves. So when women, who exclude them outside geek culture, invade those save spaces and force the scene to conform to their wants and rules they leave the men with nowhere to go. Where can they flee? They’re backed into a corner. Attacking invading women is not harrassment – it is defense. Women hate socially inept males. Why should they not hate them back when they try to destoy their only sanctuary.

vixyish:

animatedamerican:

geekandmisandry:

Ok, where to begin with this trainwreck.

Gaming was never yours. Never. It was not designed as a safe space for guys free of women and you have no exclusive rights to the medium in the same way that no gender have exclusive rights to film and television. If women said you were not allowed to read books because that is their safe thing you would think they were ridiculous, you do not own a medium.

Women are not required to want to hang out with you in real life in order to game, that is another bullshit standard you apply to them and not to men. If a guy is a jerk whom you wouldn’t want to hang out with in real life you don’t throw a tantrum.

Women are not a hivemind, we each have our own individual thoughts and feelings and judge you individually. 

That being said, women don’t want to hang out with you, not because you’re socially inept, but because you are an entitled asshole who thinks that women owe you their time outside of games in order to be able to play games without hostility. 

If men weren’t hostile towards women, who have just as much a right to game as them, and weren’t so hostile towards the concept of fair representation then there would be any changes to the “scene” required, because people would already have a fair and fun experience.

Games are not your sanctuary mate, they are a product medium and never once has it been yours. Get over yourself.

Okay but wait, let’s talk about geek culture as distinct from the product mediums, let’s talk about geek culture as a place where socially shunned geeks can be with like-minded people and be themselves.  Because that really is a valuable thing, and it’s reasonable for geeks to feel a little threatened when their sanctuary is invaded by – wups, hang on, we skipped a bit.

Where the hell did anyone ever get the idea that all socially shunned geeks are male?

I mean, I know where you got the idea, Nony, you got it from thinking of The Women as a single homogenous entity that’s distinct from “people”.  The Women reject you.  The Women exclude you from social acceptance.  The Women are the holders of the status and power you so desperately want – not that they actually have status and power, not the way individual people do, that would be ridiculous, but that by their acceptance or rejection they confer that status onto actual people, i.e., men.  And of course The Women consistently deny that status to geeks, i.e., a specific subset of men.

The notion that any individual member of The Women could experience social rejection, especially for being a geek, is clearly laughable from this point of view.  (Is there a singular word for a member of The Women?  What would you even call that?)  So there can’t, obviously, be any fellow-feeling between any given geek (i.e., male geek) and any given … Women-singleton? … yeah, okay, let’s go with that.  They can’t possibly have anything to share in geek culture, such as an interest in gaming or science fiction, much less similar experiences of a childhood full of social ineptitude and being bullied and feeling unwanted and hated by the beautiful people.  Obviously.

And anyway there’s no reason for a Women-singleton to need a safe space like geek culture!  Why would they?  They’ve got The Women to be part of, don’t they?

Where the hell did anyone ever get the idea that all socially shunned geeks are male?

SERIOUSLY THIS.  “Women hate socially inept males.” Dear god. You think there are no socially inept women in the world? You think women never experience rejection? 

And again with The Women. Lots of women have liked and loved lots of socially inept males. I married a self-described socially inept male. 

This touches on a myth I see often and absolutely hate: the “women have all the dating power” trope. “Women can get a date/get laid any time they want, but men can’t!” 

The trope has an inherent double-standard: what it’s really saying is “women can get laid any time they want if they don’t care who they’re fucking, but men can’t get the beautiful hot sexy woman.

ANYONE can get laid any time they want, if they don’t care who they’re fucking. Men can totally get laid any time they want. But that’s not how it works, for any gender. Everyone wants someone that fits their own standards of attractiveness, personality, etc. Whatever. That’s fine! You have the right to be choosy about who you give your time, attention, and body to!

But this trope assigns that right to men by unspoken default, and vilifies women for exercising it.

prismatic-bell:

“Any presentation to a lady in a public ball-room, for the mere
purpose of dancing, does not entitle you to claim her acquaintance
afterwards; therefore, should you meet her, at most you may lift your
hat; but even that is better avoided – unless, indeed, she first bow
– as neither she nor her friends can know who or what you are.“

–Richard A. Wells, 1893, in regard to manners at a ball or dance.

“JUST BECAUSE SHE DANCES WITH YOU DOESN’T MEAN SHE OWES YOU SHIT” LITERALLY DATES BACK 113 YEARS I DON’T WANT TO HEAR ABOUT HOW WE’RE BEING “TOO SENSITIVE” TODAY JFC

food-fitness-study:

randomguy2015:

the-exercist:

jormancomegato:

Stay fit and healty with us … #gymmaniacs #gymmemes #gymmeme #funny #muscle #fit #fitness #nutrition #health #healthy #bodybuilder #bodybuilding #gym #lift #workout #doyoueven #inspiration #motivation

Women be like: I’m doing single-arm rows right now, where the proper form requires me to bend over with a slightly arched back and look upwards to maintain that posture. With my body shape, it is physically impossible to do this without sticking out my chest somewhat. So just because I’m executing good form doesn’t mean that I want to be stared at.

Women be like: Designers specifically make these athletic clothes for women like me who workout in a gym that tends to reach high temperatures, especially when I’m so active, so my light clothing doesn’t necessarily mean that I want a dude’s attention. It just means that the room is too hot to wear layers, these clothes give me greater mobility, and I like the way that they look and feel on me. 

Guys be like: I look at a lot of softcore gym porn and know that women typically don’t act like this in daily life, but I enjoy objectifying them anyway and like to justify my complete lack of respect towards them by placing the blame entirely on their shoulders. Blaming women for my attention allows me to never acknowledge how creepy and disrespectful my own actions may be. 

Guys need to be like: A woman’s clothing is not consent. 

(Insert smackdown gif here)

YES SO MUCH YES

Star Wars Merch’s Sexism Problem: #WheresRey Highlights Dearth in Female Toys

Star Wars Merch’s Sexism Problem: #WheresRey Highlights Dearth in Female Toys

kenobrea:

cheshiretiffy:

skeleton-warrior:

profeminist:

image
image

“As disappointing as it was to see Rey left out of the Target six-pack of The Force Awakens figures, it came as an even bigger shock when fans discovered Hasbro’s popular Star Wars: The Force Awakens Battle Action Millennium Falcon set  comes with a light-up Millennium Falcon, a BB-8, a Finn, a Chewbacca…and no Rey. [Hey, she’s only the PILOT – PF]

“Command the Millennium Falcon and strike against the formidable power of the First Order,” reads the Hasbro product description, accompanied by the image of a young boy playing with the set. “Imagine its amazing stealth as it dodges asteroids and blasts enemies. Its movie-accurate decoration helps capture the excitement of the latest saga.”

The omission of Rey from the Millennium Falcon—the ship that she flies in several key Force Awakens scenes—drew sharp criticism from fans. It reminded them too well of how Star Wars studio Disney similarly treated Scarlett Johansson’s Black Widow this year in its male-centric rollout of Avengers toys. Despite playing a crucial role in the Avengers team of superheroes, Black Widow was included in only a fraction of Disney and Marvel’s official merchandising.

More problematically, like Rey, Black Widow was rewritten out of her out of her own scene in Age of Ultron products depicting her motorcycle-flying sequence, replaced by Captain America and Iron Man. Toy partner Hasbro did the same to Gamora, the lone female hero of Guardians of the Galaxy, who could only be found on a handful of officially licensed items despite the fact that 44 percent of the Marvel ensemble’s opening weekend audience were female.

“It’s frustrating and stuff, and it bums me out,” added Guardians director James Gunn of the Gamora toy snafu. “I had a big conversation about this yesterday with one of my producers at Marvel about trying to make sure, especially, that Gamora is represented more in [merchandise] and all the Guardians toys.”

But the difference between Age of Ultron, Guardians of the Galaxy, and The Force Awakens is that in the Star Wars sequel Rey isn’t just one member of an ensemble of heroes: She’s literally the lead character.”

Read the full piece here

HEY HASBRO!!!

image
image
image

IM SO FUCKING MAD

This is why my son has his own Monster High and Rapunzel stuff. If “boy toy” lines keep neglecting female characters, I will keep giving him mine.

I went to Target today and their entire Star Wars aisle was newly stocked after Christmas- and there literally was not ONE. REY. TOY. IN THE ENTIRE AISLE. Not even Rey’s PICTURE on a toy. NOT. ONE.

mewiet:

scriptscribbles:

siphersaysstuff:

nashscribblings:

Gee, something’s … missing.  Can’t quite put my finger on it …

What kills me is that this is a Target set.

You know. The chain that’s been slowly but surely breaking down the boy/girl barrier with kids’ stuff; removing pink backdrops from some aisles, not separating the “boys” and “girls” bedsheets and etc.

What kills me is that they left out the main character of the film and that that absence is just going to get more conspicuous as time passes.

Well there goes the tissue paper thin lie that Black Widow, Leia, and Gamora don’t get action figures and likewise products made for them because they’re less popular and definitely not the main characters of their respective films.

Four decades of feminism later I am reading the comedian Angela Barnes’ blog. “I am ugly, and I am proud,” she writes. She goes on to say: “The fact is I don’t see people in magazines who look like me. I don’t see people like me playing the romantic lead or having a romantic life.”
At the top of the blog is a picture of Barnes. And the thing is, she isn’t ugly. Neither is she beautiful. She’s normal looking. She’s somewhere in the middle of the spectrum, just like lots of women you see every day in real life.
It made me think of this year’s Wimbledon ladies’ final between Sabine Lisicki and Marion Bartoli. When Bartoli won, the BBC commentator John Inverdale infamously said, “Do you think Bartoli’s dad told her when she was little, ‘You’re never going to be a looker, you’re never going to be a Sharapova, so you have to be scrappy and fight’?”
The first thing I thought was: this woman has just won a tennis tournament! And she’s being judged on her looks! And then I thought: but Bartoli is attractive. Sure, she’s not at the very highest point on the scale – she doesn’t look like a top model. But she’s pretty. And, in any case, why should it matter? She’s a top athlete. Surely that’s what counts.
A sports commentator refers to a pretty woman as “not a looker”. A normal-looking woman thinks she’s ugly. Why?
Because, even though the world is full of normal and pretty women, the world we see – the world of television, films, magazines and websites – is full of women who are top-of-the-scale beauties.
And right now, in the second decade of the 21st century, the situation is more extreme than ever. If you’re a woman, a huge proportion of your role models are beautiful. So if you’re normal looking, you feel ugly. And if you’re merely pretty, men feel free to comment on how un-beautiful you are.
As a normal-looking man, I find myself in a completely different position. Being normal makes me feel, well, normal. Absolutely fine. As if the way I look is not an issue. That’s because it’s not an issue.
As a normal-looking man, I’m in good company. Sure, some male actors and celebrities are very good looking. Brad Pitt. George Clooney. Russell Brand.
But many of Hollywood’s leading men, like me, look like the sort of blokes you see every day, in real life. Russell Crowe, Kevin Spacey, Bruce Willis, Jack Black, Seth Rogen, Martin Freeman, Tom Hanks, Steve Carell, Jim Carrey, Will Ferrell, Vince Vaughn, Brendan Fraser… In fact, you might almost say that most leading men are normal-looking blokes.
It’s true of television, too. Bryan Cranston, who plays the lead in Breaking Bad – he’s a normal. James Gandolfini – he was a normal. And chubby too. Kevin Whately – normal. Ben Miller – normal. TV cops all look normal. Ray Winstone looks normal. Tim Roth looks normal. They portray people who are interesting for what they do, not what they look like.
Oh, and think of sitcoms. The Big Bang Theory features four normal-looking blokes and a stunningly beautiful woman. New Girl is about two normal blokes, a guy who’s quite good looking, and two women who are… yes, strikingly beautiful.
When I watch the news, on whatever channel, it’s presented by the classic partnership of an ordinary-looking guy and a gorgeous woman. After the news, I watch the weather. Male weather presenters look like standard males. Female weather presenters look like models.
Footballers look normal. Footballers’ wives and girlfriends look stunning. Daytime television presenters: men look like Phillip Schofield; women look like Holly Willoughby.
A typical Saturday-night judges’ panel consists of two types of people – middle-aged blokes and young, stunning women. Sometimes a normal-looking or ageing woman slips through the net – but then, like Arlene Phillips, her days are soon numbered.
Countdown had an attractive woman and an ageing bloke; when the attractive woman began to show signs of ageing, she was axed – replaced by a woman who was, of course, strikingly beautiful.
Who presents historical documentaries? Guys like David Starkey. Normals. And what happened when a normal-looking woman, Mary Beard, presented a series about the ancient world? She was mocked for not being attractive enough.
In a recent interview Dustin Hoffman, another normal, made a revealing comment. Remember when he dressed up as a woman in Tootsie? “I went home and started crying,” he said. Why?
“Because I think I am an interesting woman when I look at myself on screen. And I know that if I met myself at a party, I would never talk to that character. Because she doesn’t fulfil physically the demands that we’re brought up to think women have to have in order to ask them out… I have been brainwashed.”

steffy-beff:

feminismandhappiness:

sassy-gay-justice:

socialistlesbian:

virginiaisforhaters:

maaarine:

“15 Men React To The Idea Of Taking Their Wife’s Last Name After Marriage”

Men believe the family is their domain but when it comes to watching the children or doing chores suddenly it’s not their responsibility

“If hoards of men started taking their wives’ surnames, it would be an unfortunate and perhaps irreversible step towards a matriarchal goddess culture, which blows for guys because those cultures used to routinely kill male infants and treat males like slaves. In a world where there are already very few incentives for men to get legally shackled, this is one slippery slope I wouldn’t want to slide down.” – Ricky, 27

I’M SORRY BUT WHAT IS HAPPENING TO FEMALE CHILDREN AND WOMEN AROUND THIS WORLD??? OH YES, JUST THAT.

I feel like I need to trigger warn this as “infuriating male opinions”

Actual equality is perceived as inequality by most men. And by a lot of us women, because that’s what society has taught us. I actually grew up in a place where woman keep their surnames after marrying, so when I learned that women here are suposed to change it, I felt bewildered… Your name is a part of your identity… How could it affect U.S. men and women to be raised from birth, ones knowing that their surname will someday change to another they don’t know yet based on the man they marry, and the others, knowing that they will be called the same all their lifes and that their future wifes who they still don’t know will assume their surnames? I’m sure it has to condition them somehow. It can’t be good growing up knowing that your name, your symbollyc identity, is temporary and will be changed by a man. it has to have an impact

(and that ELijah boy is gr8t. “Listen, I’m a feminist.” Isn’t he precious? *sarcasm*)

I like how women are expected to change their last names and when the other way around is suggested, it’s so taboo and unacceptable. Hypocritical, much?

Guys, if you can’t fathom why women hate being catcalled, just think about those obnoxious salesmen at mall kiosks. You know how awkward and annoyed you feel trying to get by them as they desperately try to push their shitty product on you?

Imagine if that happened EVERYWHERE, and if – instead of shoe cleaner – their product was DICK.

That’s a woman’s reality: a never-ending, thinly veiled penis infomercial. Moral reasons aside, you shouldn’t catcall simply because it doesn’t work. From an economic standpoint, dick is over-saturating the marketplace. Supply and demand. Too many guys are trying to supply dick. Droves of desperate dudes are drastically decreasing dick demand, detrimenting distribution.

Simply put: The Cock Market is an all time low.

The reason vagina is such a valuable commodity is because it’s harder to come by. You can’t just get it through a hole in the wall at a truck stop bathroom. You want your product to sell, you have to create a need.

In everyone’s best interest, gentlemen, treat your dicks like the McRib. Periodically take them off the market. Give consumers a chance to miss them and forget how gross they really are.

Nat Baimel (@NatBaimel)