Well surely no-one investigating his past for other instances of anti-semitism will come up with anything else that bad!
Oh.
How the hell was he not sacked after writing that first article? Just what the actual fuck?
That’s the part that infuriates me the most, too. Apparently the gist of it (it’s been taken down now in the wake of the other one) is something along the lines of “fine I’ll concede that SOME Jews were murdered but you can’t call it a Holocaust because blah blah blah irrelevant pedantry” and I just. Can’t. I want the editors who okayed it raked over the coals as well.
