This might be a strange question but do you have a hard time getting into books written by female historians. Not sure why but it always feels like the female historians are missing some gravitas.
That’s not a strange question; it’s an embarrassingly dumb question.
No, I do not have any difficulties with reading books written by female historians. I imagine that this might surprise someone like you, but women have brains that understand history just as strongly and sometimes even better than men. Female historians don’t have a credibility handicap just because they have different sexual organs than men. Not only are women capable of understanding history, but they also possess critical thinking abilities that allow them to tell stories or pass along their knowledge just like any man. Amazing, isn’t it?