Oooh is this what you mean? But it seems to be an experiment carried out by anti-Mail folks who wanted to make a point. And don’t get me wrong, they did make a point, but considering how unbelievably awful the Mail is I don’t think it’ll make much difference. :(
Yes, thank you !
I suspected that the article had got stuff wrong (it’s honnestly not the first time the site relays misinformations). And then they said the experiment was carried out by “the daily mail, a great british journal” and I was like “uh, that doesn’t sound right”. Then there was two twitter links that I thought were indeed two twitter accounts against the daily mail but I lacked context and that’s when I turned to you.
So again, thank you ! I will provide my friend with the link you kindly gave me.
No problem! :) Oh gosh, a great british journal? They barely deserve even one of those descriptors.
